


· Stronger defense against lawsuits and citizen complaints
Accredited agencies are better able to defend themselves against lawsuits and citizen complaints. Agencies report a decline in legal actions against them, once they become accredited. According to CALEA, agencies that are accredited experience 17% fewer lawsuits than non-accredited agencies. In those instances where liability is found, CALEA accredited agencies pay out 33% less than non-accredited agencies.
· Greater accountability within the agency
Accreditation standards give the Chief of Police a proven management system of written directives, sound training, clearly defined lines of authority, and routine reports that support decision-making and resource allocation.
· Staunch support from government officials
Accreditation provides objective evidence of an agency’s commitment to excellence in leadership, resource management, and service delivery. Thus, government officials are more confident in the agency’s ability to operate efficiently and to meet community needs.
· Increased community advocacy
Accreditation embodies the precepts of community-oriented policing. It creates a forum in which police and citizens work together to prevent and control challenges confronting law enforcement and provides clear direction about community expectations.
Accreditation is a continuing process. After accreditation is awarded, an agency is required to illustrate continued compliance with standards by being re-accredited every 3 years.